|
|
1.
Tell
the Mayor and Council that you want controls over
house bulk and scale, to preserve and protect our community and
neighborhood
character, and property values.
Tell them that you want these controls implemented
quickly. Please
send letters and email
messages. Here are the email addresses for the Mayor and Council.
Please also consider
making a
statement during public comment, at a Council meeting.
2. Insist
that citizens, not city staff, control the decisions on the management
of house
bulk and scale in Morro
Bay. These are policy
decisions and should be made by the citizens and
by their elected and appointed representatives in open, public
session.
The specific language which will implement these policy decisions
should then
be the responsibility of City staff.
One
local citizen recently
said,
It has been argued
that our City
planners are the professional experts, and that decisions about
planning should
be left to their discretion. This is, of course,
nonsense.
Architects are "professional experts", but it would make no sense to
ask an architect to design a home without telling him how many bedrooms
are
desired. Lawyers are "professional experts", but would you
expect an attorney to draft an effective will without telling him whom
you wish
to inherit your belongings?”
City
officials need
to know that the citizens of Morro
Bay
are not interested in giving up
control over such important issues as our zoning code, the content of
which
affects every citizen.
3. Tell us what
you think. We
are compiling citizen concerns and ideas
on controlling mansionization
to preserve our
neighborhood and community character and property values. You can send us email (including, if you like,
copies of messages
sent to the Mayor and Council) at visionmbay@hotmail.com
4. Get
the facts regarding developer
arguments against house bulk and scale controls.
|
The Arguments
|
The Facts
|
|
Bulk and scale controls such as Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) will not work in all areas of Morro
Bay
|
Bulk and scale controls are
appropriate in every neighborhood.
FAR requirements can be tied to lot size, and
special bulk and scale considerations can be applied to different areas
with zone overlays
|
|
Bulk and scale controls will reduce
property values
|
We found bulk and scale controls,
including FAR, in cities with some of the highest property values in California, including Belvedere,
Carmel, Coronado, Del
Mar, Mill Valley, Monterey,
and Tiburon. Many have argued that by preserving the aesthetics and
charm of a community, its property values are also preserved. This certainly appears to
be the case for the cities mentioned here.
|
|
Bulk and scale controls are not fair
to lot owners, who will not make as much money on their investments as
they expected.
|
1. Any ordinance that benefits the
majority of community members, while taking into account the rights of
the individual is fair. Our
national government is based on this principle.
2. The City and its citizens are not
obligated to sacrifice the best interests of the majority, in order to guarantee that
a few land speculators will make maximum profit on their investments.
|
|
Bulk and scale controls will hurt
families, who need larger houses
|
Using the Capitola approach as an
example, the allowable ratio for a VERY small
lot of 2,650 square feet or less is .58.
So, even on a lot that small, one could build
a house with 1,537 feet of floor area.
This is easily enough for a basic
three-bedroom, two bath home.
On a typical North Morro Bay lot of 5,000 square
feet, (again using the Capitola FAR, which for this lot size is .50)
one could build a house with 2,500 square feet of floor area.
|
|
If we implemented FAR, owners of small
lots would be limited to 900 square foot houses
|
Using the Capitola FAR specifications
once again, we find that in order to be restricted to a 900 square foot
house, one would have to have a lot that is just 1,551.7 square feet
– approximately 30 x 50.
Given our CURRENT zoning code, you would not
likely be allowed to build anything much larger than that.
|
|
Developers are focusing on building
big houses because that is what people want.
Developers are just responding to a changing
demographic.
|
This argument seems to imply that only
rich people who can afford big houses want to live in Morro Bay. We think that is just
plain silly. Obviously,
many middle-and low-income people want to live here, too, and will be
happy to buy smaller, less expensive homes – if someone will
just build them.
|
|
If we implemented FAR, no one would be
able to build two-story houses
|
FAR does not dictate the number of
floors in a house. The
allowed square footage can be used in a variety of ways, allowing for a
variety of home designs.
|
|
Bulk and scale controls are not common
and/or not well-tested in practice
|
We have found cities all over the
country that use bulk and scale controls, 110 of them in
California. According
to the planner we spoke with in Monterey, that
city has been using FAR for over 20 years.
|
|
Implementing bulk and scale controls
would significantly impact Morro
Bay’s
tax revenues, since the taxes on the larger houses will be a lot higher.
|
Our
research has determined that the
impact of house size/price on Morro
Bay’s
tax revenues is negligible. This is illustrated by the
following data:
The 2005/06 percentage
allocation for Morro
Bay
was 0.59779% (this number changes slightly from year to year.)
For this example, we
examine the tax revenues generated by
two houses, a medium-sized house, valued at
$700,000 and a larger one, valued at $900,000
· For
the home with an assessed value of $700,000, the annual property tax
would be approximately $7,000. Morro
Bay’s
share would be $41.85
· For
the home with an assessed value of $900,000, the annual property tax
would be approximately $9,000. $9,000 x .0059779 = $53.80
Thus, while the
difference in the prices of the homes is $200,000
the difference in revenue for Morro Bay, as
illustrated by these two sample houses would be just $11.95.
Clearly, even a house
priced at two or three million would not generate a great deal of
revenue for the city, and certainly a negligible amount more than that
generated by the more moderately sized/priced $700,000 house.
|
|
|